[syndicated profile] askamanager_feed

Posted by Ask a Manager

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My boss told a coworker I’m full of myself

I was hired from outside the organization two months ago to turn a lagging department around. My boss, the CEO, was hired from outside about eight months ago for the same reason.

This week my peer told me, “I told Boss that he knocked it out of the park hiring you. He said ‘Yep, and she really sings her praises, too.’”

I’m sooo embarrassed. I had no idea that I’d made any comments that came across that way, let alone enough to be a trend. My confidence is badly shaken.

I have been critical to my boss about many things I have found going on in my division, and then I have outlined for him how I am changing them. I have often said things like, “Why would my predecessors have done this that way? It doesn’t make any sense!” I can absolutely see why this came across poorly. I’ve been trying to demonstrate that I am doing what he hired me to do: identifying problems and implementing solutions. Instead, I’ve just come across terribly.

In addition to changing my behavior immediately, should I address this topic with him generally, without mentioning that I heard this feedback from my peer?

Yeah, criticizing your predecessors isn’t great in most circumstances. You can factually report on things you’ve found that need to be changed, but generally you should do it without editorializing about their judgment.

I probably wouldn’t raise it with your boss at this point; just be very deliberate about not doing it any more and that will hopefully take care of it. That said, if you’d be more comfortable addressing it, you could say something like, “I realized I’ve sounded critical of Marcel and Paige, and I didn’t mean to. I’m sure they had reasons for setting things up the way they did, and I don’t have the context they did.”

You could also make a point of looking for opportunities to demonstrate humility and to genuinely praise others, both of which should be helpful in counteracting whatever early impression he might have formed.

2. We don’t want employees wearing shirts with political messages

I’m a manager at a very small and young company. We do not have HR, and we’re trying to figure out an employee code of conduct that is both respectful and legal.

Our company provides services to the public as a whole, though we especially cater to and market to queer/trans, BIPOC, and other marginalized communities. As such, many of the people who choose to work for us are members of those communities (though not all) and are generally quite politically liberal.

Recently one of our customer service employees wore an item of clothing that showed their ideological view on a subject that is both controversial and often associated with liberal views, but the subject was in no way related to the work we do. I personally do not agree with the view, but my feeling is that even if I did agree with it, it was an inappropriate thing to wear in that setting since it 1) wasn’t relevant to our work, and 2) could be upsetting to some of our customers. Also, a member of our staff was wearing it at work could imply that we as the organization hold views that we definitely do not.

As a result, we on the leadership team are talking about producing company-branded shirts and asking our employees to wear those. While that may take care of the immediate clothing issue, we’d like to create a dress code and/or code of conduct that makes it clear that we will continue to be obvious about our support and inclusion of marginalized communities, but we also discourage display or discussion of other political views when they are not relevant to the purpose of our work. Do you have any guidance for how to draw that line?

Switching over to requiring a company shirt every day — essentially a uniform — is an overreaction unless there’s some other reason to do that.

You can simply have a dress code that prohibits political messages on clothing (or messages/writing/images if that seems easier/cleaner than debating what counts as “political” and what doesn’t) — which is a very common and routine policy for employers to have. Explain that it’s to avoid alienating customers who hold different views and to avoid giving the impression that the organization itself endorses the viewpoint. You can note that the organization very well might endorse the viewpoint, but it’s impractical to evaluate every t-shirt in advance to ensure it’s aligned with your messaging.

If people seem irked because they think some messages should obviously be allowed (for example, a pro-equality t-shirt), explain that without a blanket ban you’ll end up spending time debating exactly where the lines are, which will end up distracting from the actual work you’re there to do.

(And I write this as someone who won’t be returning to a massage clinic I’ve gone to for years because I don’t want a massage from someone whose water bottle has a sticker inciting violence against Jews. People do remove their business over this stuff.)

3. Everyone has suddenly started using my full name

My name is a very standard first name for American men, but I go by a very standard nickname of said first name both personally and professionally (think “Matthew” and “Matt”). I’ve been at my current job for a little over two years and have rarely had a problem with people calling me “Matt” before the last couple of months.

At the end of our staff retreat in June, one of our executives referred to me as Matthew in front of our entire staff. I made a joke about him using my “government name” and that being absurd as I’ve always gone by Matt, which he apologized for. Beginning around the same time, he’s done it again, our CEO has done it, directors have done it. I’m getting introduced to external partners as Matthew. I just learned that one of the interns I managed from the summer, when she and I had a discussion about others calling me by the wrong name, referred to me by my full first name in a social media post.

I realize this has a different flair than the standard “manager compulsively nicknaming employees,” and it feels silly, but I feel wildly disrespected. While my full first name is a great name that I enjoy, none of these people are my mother and I feel like I’m about to get scolded. I began at this company with my nickname and that’s how everyone has met me. There are only 25 of us and I’ve been in roles spanning across the organization; everyone knows me, and this is not from a lack of familiarity.

I’m extremely consistent about correcting people when it happens and reinforcing that my name is, in fact, Matt, but it keeps happening and I can’t shake the feeling that I’m not being taken seriously because of this. What would you advise?

That’s extremely odd! Can you just address it directly with each person who does it the next time they do? For example: “You and others recently started calling me Matthew, but I’ve always gone by Matt. Can you return to using Matt?” And then if that same person does it again: “Okay, what is up with this? It’s Matt, and I’m baffled about why everyone has switched en masse. Can you help me remind people it’s Matt?” And from there, if it still keeps happening, just correct it every time and move on: “It’s Matt. The answer to your question about oatmeal research is…”

4. Is this interview request excessive?

I’m in the middle of a lengthy job hunt and am midway through an interview process for a fairly senior role where they have now asked me to create a 30-minute roadmap presentation for the future of their product. To support this, they’ve sent me 8(!)+ hours of video training and several lengthy scholarly articles that I need to read all before even starting the work — with the interview in less than a week. This feels excessive to me but I’m looking for a gut check. I haven’t interviewed in years and that was for entry-level positions. My years of reading AAM are throwing up flags but with how the job market is now it’s also hard to feel like I should just stop this process.

It’s excessive — the eight hours of video “training” (?!) more than the rest of it.

Whether or not that means you should decline to do it is a different question; you’ve got to factor in how much you want the job, your sense of how strong a candidate they think you are, and how many other options you have. But it’s excessive, for sure.

Related:
should you do free work as part of a job interview?

5. Announcing a new job if you just announced a different job

You’ve written before about how to handle having to turn down a job offer that you already accepted. My question is, how do you handle the announcement to peers on LinkedIn and the like when you make a sudden switch like that? This is all still hypothetical, but it could very quickly become something I have to contend with.

I recently accepted an offer for a contract gig after a long search and posted my happy news on LinkedIn, receiving many congratulatory accolades from colleagues and friends. After accepting, I canceled an interview for a second contract gig that had been scheduled for a few days later. Though the job description was a good match for me, the rate was ridiculously low and the recruiter hadn’t gotten back to me when I emailed him about raising it. The evening after I notified him of my withdrawal, the recruiter suddenly came back saying the client is very interested in me and they may be able to make me a better deal than the one I accepted and they want me to keep the original interview slot.

I want to be ethical and professional, but what’s the best move here? Is it wrong to at least hear them out? I want to be an honorable person, but this is a brutal job market and I’ve been laid off twice in two years, so I also need to do what’s best for me and my family as well. Sigh. Even if it doesn’t make me a horrible person, just the thought of rescinding my acceptance and disappointing/angering/inconveniencing so many people makes me feel like a monster.

Finally, back to that LinkedIn announcement. If I did accept the second gig and had to rescind my acceptance of the first one, what should I do about that post? Just leave it to gather dust? Quietly delete it and eventually change my status to reflect my new job? Post an explanation (apology?) of what happened with a new announcement? Delete my LinkedIn profile altogether and go into hiding? Something else?

Go to the interview and assess the job (and their offer, if one materializes). You get to do what’s best for you, including backing out of an offer if a better one materializes. It’s business!

For LinkedIn, you’d just write something like, “Change in plans! I’m happy to announce that I’ll be working as a senior frog historian for the Amphibian Coalition, beginning next week.” That part isn’t a big deal; people know this stuff happens.

The post my boss told a coworker I’m full of myself, employees wearing shirts with political messages, and more appeared first on Ask a Manager.

[syndicated profile] askamanager_feed

Posted by Ask a Manager

This comment section is open for any non-work-related discussion you’d like to have with other readers, by popular demand.

Here are the rules for the weekend posts.

Book recommendation of the week: Sister Wife, by Christine Brown Woolley. I don’t know what made me pick this up but once I did, I couldn’t put it down. Written by one of the (former!) three sister wives from TLC’s reality show about a polygamous marriage, it’s absolutely fascinating. (Amazon, Bookshop)

* I earn a commission if you use those links.

The post weekend open thread – September 20-21, 2025 appeared first on Ask a Manager.

Assorted Stupidity #170

Sep. 19th, 2025 08:23 pm
[syndicated profile] loweringthebar_feed

Posted by Kevin

LTB logo

  • You’re going to regret this,” a state assistant attorney general told officers trying to get her to leave a restaurant last month in Rhode Island. Staff asked the AG and a friend to leave for reasons not explained but which one is tempted to infer from all the shrieking and other evidence captured by police bodycams. Officers knew she was an AG because she repeatedly told them so and tried to give them various orders on that basis. All this got her was arrested, but she kept trying. Nice work here by the reporter: “As she was placed in a police cruiser, [the AG] said, ‘Buddy, you’re going to regret this. You’re going to regret it. I’m an A,’ with the ‘G’ cut off as the officer shut the door.” So far there has been no further report as to who may be regretting what.
  • Do tech bros get involved in some shady deals? Sometimes. Do they generally put the details in writing in a contract section entitled “Shady Deals”? I don’t think so. But see Yen v. Ghahramani, 2025 BCSC 1778 (British Columbia S. Ct. Sept. 15, 2025) (resolving dispute in which corporate principals “agreed to divide the proceeds of three enumerated ‘shady’ deals 50-50,” as set forth “in a section entitled ‘Shady Deals'”). Unfortunately, the decision involves only corporate law and so mentions said deals only in passing. There is a reference to an incident where phony invoices were exchanged for “bags of cash,” which sounds shady but apparently was not enumerated in the “Shady Deals” section of the contract.
  • FYI, if you receive any court orders pertaining to David Cramer, Arizona inmate #124771, please confirm they are legitimate before taking any action, including but not limited to releasing the said David Cramer from prison. According to this report, Cramer, other members of his family, and an associated business have a history of filing fake documents and orders dating back to at least 2012. This continued after Cramer began serving a 30-year sentence for kidnapping in 2017, after which the fake documents and orders began to include demands for his release. Yet despite that history, prison officials were somehow duped into releasing Cramer in June after receiving yet another bogus order. He was re-arrested in August. The clerk’s office declined to comment for the report, citing an “active and ongoing investigation,” though it frankly doesn’t seem all that complicated.
  • Speaking of geniuses, “[a] Minnesota man has been charged with threatening to assault and murder a federal judge after staff at a local library spotted him printing copies of a 236-page manifesto entitled ‘How to Kill a Federal Judge,’ U.S. prosecutors said on Tuesday.” It sounds like Robert Ivers’ attorney may make a First Amendment argument that this was “only” a “how-to book,” but that wasn’t the only evidence, just like it wasn’t in 2019 when Ivers was convicted of … threatening to kill a federal judge. He seems to have updated it since, because it now specifically mentions several judges including the one who presided over his trial and the judge he was convicted of threatening. But he still doesn’t seem to see anything wrong with it, because the criminal complaint says he “showed the manifesto to library staff and … gave them a three-page flyer advertising it.” Well, speech is one thing, action is another. Then there’s advertising it. See also Author of ‘How to Murder Your Husband’ Convicted of Murdering Husband” (May 27, 2022).
  • For the record, Lowering the Bar‘s official position is that no one should kill anyone else. It reserves the right to criticize people.

open thread – September 19, 2025

Sep. 19th, 2025 03:00 pm
[syndicated profile] askamanager_feed

Posted by Ask a Manager

It’s the Friday open thread!

The comment section on this post is open for discussion with other readers on any work-related questions that you want to talk about (that includes school). If you want an answer from me, emailing me is still your best bet*, but this is a chance to take your questions to other readers.

* If you submitted a question to me recently, please do not repost it here, as it may be in my queue to answer.

The post open thread – September 19, 2025 appeared first on Ask a Manager.

Profile

makz: Photo of makz in teal sunglasses (Default)
makz (they/she)

September 2025

S M T W T F S
 123 4 56
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios